Debian Bug report logs -
#947124
apache-log4j1.2: CVE-2019-17571
Reported by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:39:01 UTC
Severity: grave
Tags: security, upstream
Found in versions apache-log4j1.2/1.2.17-5, apache-log4j1.2/1.2.17-7, apache-log4j1.2/1.2.17-8
Reply or subscribe to this bug.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, carnil@debian.org, team@security.debian.org, team@security.debian.org, Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
:
Bug#947124
; Package src:apache-log4j1.2
.
(Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to carnil@debian.org, team@security.debian.org, team@security.debian.org, Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
.
(Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Source: apache-log4j1.2
Version: 1.2.17-8
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Control: found -1 1.2.17-7
Control: found -1 1.2.17-5
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for apache-log4j1.2.
CVE-2019-17571[0]:
| Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to
| deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely
| execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget
| when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data. This affects
| Log4j versions up to 1.2 up to 1.2.17.
Note that this issue correponds to the old CVE-2017-5645 for the 2.x
branch codebasis[1].
1.2 reached end of life in 2015 accordingly, and the "right move"
would be to switch to 2.x. Which raises a question from security
support point of view: We would need to fade out apache-log4j1.2 for
bullseye at least now right? From a quick check via a simulated dak
rm, it looks right now impossible to actually remove it. Are there
current plans from the Debian Java Maintainers for that? Or is there
something I currently just miss from the big picture?
If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.
For further information see:
[0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-17571
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-17571
[1] https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2
Regards,
Salvatore
Marked as found in versions apache-log4j1.2/1.2.17-7.
Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
to submit@bugs.debian.org
.
(Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Marked as found in versions apache-log4j1.2/1.2.17-5.
Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
to submit@bugs.debian.org
.
(Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:39:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Sun Dec 22 09:09:43 2019;
Machine Name:
beach
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.