Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs)

                							

                <!--X-Body-Begin-->
<!--X-User-Header-->

oss-sec
mailing list archives
<!--X-User-Header-End-->
<!--X-TopPNI-->

By Date

By Thread

</form>

<!--X-TopPNI-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-->
<!--X-Subject-Header-Begin-->
Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs)

<!--X-Subject-Header-End-->
<!--X-Head-of-Message-->

From: Max Nikulin &lt;manikulin () gmail com&gt;

Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:38:48 +0700

<!--X-Head-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-Begin-->

<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-End-->
<!--X-Body-of-Message-->
On 11/04/2024 16:13, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Wed 10 Apr 2024 at 04:17pm +02, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

Note that the CVE assignment (by MITRE as assigning CNA) for
CVE-2024-30203 is explicitly as follows:

In Emacs before 29.3, Gnus treats inline MIME contents as trusted.

https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?h=emacs-29&amp;id=937b9042ad7426acdcca33e3d931d8f495bdd804

This commit doesn't fix anything at all, just fyi.

This Emacs commit

    2024-02-20 12:44:30 +0300 Ihor Radchenko:
    * lisp/gnus/mm-view.el (mm-display-inline-fontify): Mark contents 
untrusted.)

is not enough to fix the issue. More changes are required to make the
fix effective, namely

ccc188fcf98 2024-02-20 12:43:51 +0300 Ihor Radchenko: * lisp/files.el 
(untrusted-content): New variable.
6f9ea396f49 2024-02-20 12:47:24 +0300 Ihor Radchenko: org-latex-preview: 
Add protection when `untrusted-content' is non-nil

When external Org mode is loaded, that version should contain

https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=03635a335
2024-02-20 12:47:24 +0300 Ihor Radchenko: org-latex-preview: Add 
protection when `untrusted-content' is non-nil

besides Emacs commits ccc188fcf98 and 937b9042ad7

Emacs commit 6f9ea396f49 (fix of built-in Org mode) is currently
associated with CVE-2024-30203, however Org mode commit 03635a335
is not.

<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->

<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->

By Date

By Thread

Current thread:

Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Sean Whitton (Apr 08)

Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Eli Zaretskii (Apr 08)

Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Max Nikulin (Apr 08)

Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Ihor Radchenko (Apr 08)

Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Sean Whitton (Apr 10)

Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Ihor Radchenko (Apr 10)
Re: Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Salvatore Bonaccorso (Apr 10)
Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Max Nikulin (Apr 10)
Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Sean Whitton (Apr 11)

Re: Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Sean Whitton (Apr 11)
Re: Is CVE-2024-30203 bogus? (Emacs) Max Nikulin (Apr 11)

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->