libraw: CVE-2021-32142

Debian Bug report logs - #1031790
libraw: CVE-2021-32142

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: libraw: CVE-2021-32142

Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 20:55:00 +0100

Source: libraw
Version: 0.20.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/issues/400
X-Debbugs-Cc: carnil@debian.org, Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org>
Control: fixed -1 0.21.1-1

Hi,

The following vulnerability was published for libraw. The wording for
the CVE description from the feed is disputable, believe this should
be at most DoS.

CVE-2021-32142[0]:
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in LibRaw linux/unix v0.20.0 allows
| attacker to escalate privileges via the
| LibRaw_buffer_datastream::gets(char*, int) in
| /src/libraw/src/libraw_datastream.cpp.

If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.

For further information see:

[0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-32142
    https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32142
[1] https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/issues/400
[2] https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/commit/bc3aaf4223fdb70d52d470dae65c5a7923ea2a49 

Please adjust the affected versions in the BTS as needed.

Regards,
Salvatore

Message #14 received at 1031790@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>

To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>, 1031790@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#1031790: libraw: CVE-2021-32142

Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 17:00:50 -0400

Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> writes:

> Source: libraw
> Version: 0.20.2-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: security upstream
> Forwarded: https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/issues/400
> X-Debbugs-Cc: carnil@debian.org, Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org>
> Control: fixed -1 0.21.1-1
>
> Hi,
>
> The following vulnerability was published for libraw. The wording for
> the CVE description from the feed is disputable, believe this should
> be at most DoS.

For (naughty) packages that embed libraw, is this worth
1) Trying to squeeze in a minor version update
2) waiting for stable update?
3) not worrying about for bookworm?

I know the answer is probably "it depends", just looking for feedback
and-or what other maintainers are planning on doing.

d

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.