NA

CVE-2024-35844

Published: 17/05/2024 Updated: 17/05/2024

Vulnerability Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: compress: fix reserve_cblocks counting error when out of space When a file only needs one direct_node, performing the following operations will cause the file to be unrepairable: unisoc # ./f2fs_io compress test.apk unisoc #df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.2M 100% /data unisoc # ./f2fs_io release_cblocks test.apk 924 unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 4.8M 100% /data unisoc # dd if=/dev/random of=file4 bs=1M count=3 3145728 bytes (3.0 M) copied, 0.025 s, 120 M/s unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.8M 100% /data unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk F2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS failed: No space left on device adb reboot unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 11M 100% /data unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk 0 This is because the file has only one direct_node. After returning to -ENOSPC, reserved_blocks += ret will not be executed. As a result, the reserved_blocks at this time is still 0, which is not the real number of reserved blocks. Therefore, fsck cannot be set to repair the file. After this patch, the fsck flag will be set to fix this problem. unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.8M 100% /data unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk F2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS failed: No space left on device adb reboot then fsck will be executed unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 11M 100% /data unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk 924

Mailing Lists

Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:23:50PM +0200: (pedantic: `if cve=$(cve_search "$id"); then` is a bit simpler/failproof) That's roughly what I had done earlier this week (handpicking the commits that could impact our users), but this doesn't address my second point as it won't catch any new CVE introduced before that tree tha ...
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 01:45:39PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: Very true, I do not claim to be a "robust" bash programmer at all :) True Yeah, but the json files have their own issues, more below Great Only you know your use cases, which is why we do not offer up any "grading" of kernel CVEs as Linux is used in so many differe ...